Linear vs Circular Polarized Antennas

Linear antennas are simple, cheap, light, durable and work well enough. They do suffer from polarization and multi-path interference. These issues are mitigated with circular polarized antennas. On the sending side, circular polarized antennas send usable signals regardless of orientation. On the receiving side, they capture polarized signals and– when using matching circular polarized antennas– drop multi-path interference leading to a cleaner picture. In the above video from Neil DeLillo, you can see this difference in actual real-world use. Here’s the full article that explains the difference in detail. Basically, it’s weight/durability vs picture quality.

716 Motors: More Power

Quadspex did a series of motor thrust tests that shows the power of 716  motors vs  615 motors into perspective. I’ve computed the thrust-to-weight ratios and summarized the results in the convenient table below:

Motor Thrust (g) Total Thrust (g) Thrust-to-Weight Ratio*
Stock 615 E010 7.83 31.3 1.252
RS 615 16000KV 9.3 37.2 1.488
RS 615 18000KV 11.2 44.8 1.792
MMW 615 17000KV 11.37 45.47 1.818
MMW 615 19000KV 13.03 52.13 2.085
Stock 716 E011 17.27 69.1 2.303
MMW 716 17000KV 18.47 73.9 2.463

*Assumes 25g take-off weight for 615 quad; 30g take-off weight for 716 quad

Here are the complete videos:

If you haven’t subscribed to Quadspex already, make sure you do. He’s got a bunch of very informative videos.

Tiny Whoop Frame Survey


Weighed the frames I got my hands on. Will add frames as I come across them.

Also check out my canopy survey.

65mm Frames for 6x15mm Motors
Kingkong Tiny 6 Furibee F36 Eachine E010/JJRC H36
65mm Frames for 7x16mm Motors
X-Racer X-1 Boldclash BWhoop Boldclash BWhoop Pro
Eachine E011 Makerfire Armor 65
65mm Frames for 0603/0703 Motors
Boldclash B06-65

*Note that these should be considered relative weights since I’m not sure if my scale is properly calibrated.